In the test, the participant is shown a series of ten ink blot cards and directed to respond to each with what they see in the inkblot. Because completing the Rorschach Test is time intensive and requires and psychologist trained in its usage, there have been many attempts to convert the Rorschach into an objective test for ease of use. The first work on the MCR reported impressive predictive power, however later work indicates that scores from the MCR have little value and the test does not appear to have been used for much in the last fifty years.
This test is provided here just as a historical curiosity. This test consists of ten images. Even better, if you'd like to contribute in writing a quiz, write in anytime! Contact us here. Take the test and find out who you really are! The results may surprise you.
Let's Play! Sexual imagery. Roast chicken. Animal skin. A face. Christmas tree. Flying saucer. Male reproductive organ. Totem pole. Flower bud. A person. An explosion. Octopus or squid. Female reproductive system. Flying man. Robot or drone. A demon's face. An army or navy emblem. Bat, butterfly or moth. Two people.
Lungs and chest. An animal's head. A pair of boots. Some common contents include:. Some responses are quite common, while others may be much more unique. Highly atypical responses are notable since they might indicate disturbances in thought patterns. Identifying the location of your response is another element scored in the Rorschach system. Location refers to how much of the inkblot you used to answer the question.
Determinant coding is one of the most complex features of scoring Rorschach. This is where the examiner considers the reasons why you see what you see. What inkblot features helped determine your response and how? There are six broad categories of inkblot determinants you could be responding to:.
For example, if you report seeing a flower in Card 8 because of the red color, your examiner may code that response as Color determinant. Each category has its own subcategories and there are at least 26 possible determinant codes. More than one determinant can be used in a single response. Interpreting a Rorschach record is a complex process. It requires a wealth of knowledge concerning personality dynamics generally as well as considerable experience with the Rorschach method specifically.
In addition to formal scores, Rorschach interpretation is also based on behaviors expressed during the testing, patterns of scores across responses, unique or consistent themes in the responses, and unique or idiosyncratic perceptions. A relatively fast response might indicate being at ease with others and comfortable with social relationships. A delayed response, however, might reveal that the individual struggles with social interactions.
Despite its popularity, the Rorschach is a controversial test. Many of the criticisms center on how the test is scored and whether the results have any diagnostic value. Before , there were as many as five scoring systems that differed so dramatically that they essentially represented five different versions of the test.
In , John Exner published a comprehensive new scoring system that combined the strongest elements of the earlier systems. The Exner scoring system is now the standard approach used in the administration, scoring, and interpretation of the Rorschach test.
Some experts caution, however, that since the Exner scoring system contains errors, clinicians might be prone to over-diagnosing psychotic disorders if they rely heavily on Exner's system. Another key criticism of the Rorschach is that it lacks reliability. Reliability means you get the same results no matter who is scoring the test.
Scoring relies heavily on examiner interpretation. Because of this, two examiners can arrive at two very different conclusions when looking at the same person's responses.
In addition to early criticism of the inconsistent scoring systems, detractors also find fault with its validity. In other words, does it measure what it claims to measure? In this case, can the Rorschach correctly assess your personality characteristics and emotional functioning?
Unfortunately, the answer is a resounding no. Research shows the Rorschach is most often unable to accurately diagnose most psychological disorders , including depression, anxiety, or personality disorders. However, research shows that it does have value for assessing thought disorders and schizophrenia-related symptoms. Because all of these issues, in , several psychologists recommended a moratorium on the use of the test for clinical and forensic purposes—at least until further research determined its real validity.
Today, some psychologists dismiss the Rorschach as merely a relic of psychology's past, a pseudoscience on par with phrenology. However, though the inkblot test may not be a perfect tool, it continues to be used widely, particularly for diagnosing schizophrenia—which was Rorschach's original intent for the test.
The test is used in a variety of settings, such as in schools, hospitals, and courtrooms. Ever wonder what your personality type means? Sign up to find out more in our Healthy Mind newsletter.
0コメント